O dependente que mata dolosamente o segurado para percepção de pensão por morte e as implicações previdenciárias

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the welfare effects of criminal conviction-dependent killing the insured for the perception of death pension. Society imposes repression of incompatible conduct with the social peace. Thus, one who intentionally kills the insured and claims the pension benefit, hiding this fact, acting in bad faith. With regard to theoretical and methodological studies were conducted collection, study articles, doctrines and court decisions. The results achieved with the thesis in the report concluded that the death pension granted to dependent who intentionally killed the insured must be annulled after the final judgment of the criminal sentence and consequent start of administrative proceedings for cancellation of benefit, ensuring the contradictory and legal defense to run. However, the penal sentence and the consequent responsibility of the murderer dependent can no longer be rediscussed in the administrative process. The bad faith never disappear and should be discarded the theory of consumed fact. Also confirmed that currently there is no mechanism to ensure the communication of the welfare of the criminal sentence, which abruptly affront the principle of administrative efficiency. Therefore, including the suggestion of compulsory communication of social security in the Criminal Procedure Code as soon as the final judgment certification of the criminal sentence is imposed. Also ensuring the administrative efficiency, therefore, the common good, is the suggestion of creating a National Register of Criminal Judgments final sentencing and unappealable, the State Law and Federal, common and specialized